Makeup Review: RMK Powder Foundation EX

by PJ on Monday, April 13, 2009

in -RMK, all about Japanese cosmetics, makeup, makeup - base makeup, makeup - base makeup - foundation

(RMK Powder Foundation EX in 103)

RMK is one of the Japanese beauty brands known for their base makeup. It doesn’t update its base makeup range as often as many other Japanese beauty lines, so it really attracts attention when it does. Today I am reviewing RMK’s latest powder foundation, Powder Foundation EX (SPF24, PA++, in 9 shades).

The whole idea of this foundation is to create the dewy finish of a cream foundation with a powder foundation. The foundation features a “powder” layer and a “pearl” layer. The powder layer is used as the usual powder foundation, while the pearl layer is used as a highlighter (with the brush that comes with the foundation).

This foundation gives a slightly-above-medium coverage, and the pore coverage and the lasting power are satisfactory. In terms of the dewy finish that this powder foundation sets out to achieve, it is a successful product. The powder is very fine and it doesn’t create a powdered look. The finish is indeed dewy and glowy.

According to the instruction sheet that comes with the foundation, the pearl layer should be avoided on the T-zone and the sides of the nose, which can get oily overtime. I think the pearl layer is definitely more suitable on the top of the cheekbones to both emphasize the dewy look and to highlight the cheekbones.

The downside of this foundation is that it has very little oil control efficacy. If you have oily skin, the dewy finish (just from the powder layer) will not hold overtime and will make your face appear even more oily as the day goes on. (I tried using Kiss Mat Chiffon Powder (which is the most matte loose powder I have) to set the foundation, but my face still started to look oily within two hours.)

The shade you see here is 103, which is a yellow-toned shade. It goes on a little darker than it looks in the pan, and it is about one shade darker than Majolica Majorca Skin Remake Compact in OC20 and two shades darker than my staple, ZA Two-Way Foundation in 22. (The other shade tested is 202, which is a pale pink-toned shade that is considerably paler than ZA 22.)

There are two other things worth mentioning. Firstly, the sponge that comes with the foundation doesn’t work particularly well. The fact that it is so soft and smooth actually works against itself, as it is not porous enough to grab and dispense/spread the powder efficiently. It still helps the foundation create a smooth finish on the face, but it takes a long time. (The sponge from my ZA Two-Way Foundation, which is just an ordinary powder foundation sponge similar to most others, actually works better with this foundation.)

Secondly, I like the grey velvet sleeves for the foundation case and the brush. At the first sight, they didn’t look as glamorous as the dark ones from Chanel, Dior, YSL and SUQQU. But overtime, they prove to be very practical as they never look as dusty as the dark sleeves can sometimes look. They are also somewhat chic-looking.




Overall, I think this product falls into the category of fall/winter foundations from Japanese brands and will suit people with normal or dry skin. Essentially, if your skin can take an emollient cream foundation and if you like the dewy finish from it, then this product can work well for you. (It should also provide a speedier application than applying a cream foundation). However, if you have combination or oily skin, this product is certainly not for you (even if you avoid the pearl layer). A more matte foundation with a good sebum control ability, such as Coffret D’Or’s Beauty Lasting Pact UV, will suit you a lot better.

I will review RMK’s new Super Basic Liquid Concealer next month.

Related posts:

Japanese Base Makeup Week

Foundation Face-Off: Chanel vs. SUQQU

Foundation Face-Off: Jill Stuart vs. SUQQU

Jill Stuart Moist Silk Liquid Foundation

Primavista Powder Foundation Moist Touch

{ 21 comments… read them below or add one }

Jess Monday, April 13, 2009

Thank you for this review!
I’m always interested in good powder foundations, since I’m not a sucker for liquid ones.

Definitely must check this out the next time, I travel to Tawan. :)

Cheers!
Jess

Reply

Anonymous Tuesday, April 14, 2009

Hi, I am looking for a good eye cream that can help me to get rid of those fine lines. can u recommend one?

Reply

Anonymous Wednesday, April 15, 2009

I was thinking of buying this foundation too but was unsure of which shade to get. You use the 103…which shade do you usually use for MAC?

Reply

PJ Wednesday, April 15, 2009

Hi Jess,

You are very welcome!

I am personally not a fan of liquid/cream foundations either, mainly due to my oily skin type.

Let me know what you think if you have a chance to try out this foundation.

Thank you for stopping by again! :)

Reply

PJ Wednesday, April 15, 2009

Hi,

I afraid I am not able to recommend an eye cream for you, mainly because I don’t use one. Whatever facial moisturizer I use, I use it for the eye area. Currently, I am using Olay’s Complete Care Night Enriched Cream for the evening. Please have a look at my post on it here.

Hope it helps, and thank you very much for your question! :)

Reply

PJ Wednesday, April 15, 2009

Hi,

The shades I tested for this review, 103 and 202, are provided by RMK. (Please refer to my disclosure statement at the end of my blog.) 103 is darker than my complexion, and, based on this, I would probably say 102 might be closer to my complexion and my usual foundation shade (ZA Two-Way Foundation in 22).

As for MAC, I am afraid I don’t know what MAC foundation shade is my shade, as it has been about 10 years since I last used a MAC foundation (and I don’t really remember which shade I used at the time).

Apart from ZA Two-Way Foundation in #22, I also have Majolica Majorca Skin Remake Compact in OC20, and, for your reference, it is slightly darker than ZA 22 and lighter than the RMK 103 reviewed here.

Thank you very much for your question!

Reply

MiuMiu Thursday, April 16, 2009

thanks for the review. that sucks how it probably won’t suit my oily/combo skin =/

Reply

Anonymous Friday, April 17, 2009

Hey thanks for this review,I almost wanted to get it but it won’t do for SG humid weather yeah?And thanks for the recommendation on Coffret D’Or,thanks so much!

RIn

Reply

PJ Saturday, April 18, 2009

Hi MiuMiu,

You are very welcome. Indeed, I probably wouldn’t recommend this foundation to you if you have combination/oily skin…

Thank you for stopping by again! :)

Reply

Anonymous Saturday, April 18, 2009

Hi PJ. I was wondering if you know what the ‘L’ at the end of the numbers mean? They have shades 103 and then 103L, etc. Thanks in advance :)

Reply

PJ Monday, April 20, 2009

Hi Rin,

You are very welcome!

Unless you have a drier skin type that has virtually no issue with excessive sebum, I probably wouldn’t recommend this foundation to you. It has almost no oil control ability and might not be something that will suit you.

Thank you for stopping by! :)

Reply

Lara Monday, September 14, 2009

Thank you for this review!
I bought this foundation and it's great. . .!!!but you gave me tons of info i was not aware about.
Thank you again,
Lara

Reply

PJ Tuesday, September 15, 2009

Hi Lara,

You are very welcome! I am glad that this foundation works well for you. :)

Thank you very much for stopping by! :)

Reply

Jamilla Camel Tuesday, September 22, 2009

I just got this in 102, and I absolutely love it! I've got dry skin, but it's not drying on me!

Reply

PJ Wednesday, September 23, 2009

Hi Jamilla,

Yes, this is a powder foundation that I would recommend for people with normal or dry skin. I am glad that it is working well for you!

Thank you for stopping by again! :)

Reply

winterberry_gal Sunday, December 5, 2010

Hi PJ,
Currently, I am using RMK Gel Emulsion Compact in 102, it fits my skintone, however my face looks rather white after I finished off with a layer of loose powder from Lavshuca in Lucent. Nevertheless, Lavshuca gives me a very polished overall skin texture.

Have you tried the RMK’s new loose powder called the RMK Face Powder EX ?
I am thinking whether to splurge on the new RMK’s loose powder since I am also using their gel emulsion compact.
Do you think it will gives me better results than Lavshuca’s?

Thanks.
winterberry_gal

Reply

PJ Tuesday, December 7, 2010

Hi Winterberry_Gal,

It is good to hear from you again!

I reviewed RMK’s Face Powder EX in P-00 last month. Here is the link to the post:

http://www.atouchofblusher.com/2010/11/base-makeup-review-rmk-face-powder-ex.html

Overall I think it is a very good loose powder. However, if Lavshuca’s Finish Powder in Lucent looks pale on you, RMK’s Face Powder EX in P-00 is very likely to look even paler. Perhaps 01 and 02, which are skin-tonal, might suit you better.

Thank you very much for your questions! :)

Reply

Jhoanne Luna Friday, September 16, 2011

Hi I’m just curious, is the RMK liquid foundation more suitable for oily combination skin?

Thanks

Reply

PJ Sunday, September 18, 2011

Hi Jhoanne,

I probably wouldn’t say so, and I generally don’t recommend non-powder foundations to those with combination or oily skin (no matter how lightweight they are). I’d generally recommend powder foundations to those with combination or oily skin, but, as you can see in this review, it still depends on the formulation.

Thank you for your question! :)

Reply

Jhoanne Luna Monday, September 19, 2011

Thanks for the tip. Last question. what shade from the RMK powder foundation do you think would suit a MAC NC 30 skin tone?

Reply

PJ Thursday, September 22, 2011

Hi Jhoanne,

You are very welcome!

Regarding foundation shade matching, please have a look at my FAQ page (the seventh question):

http://www.atouchofblusher.com/faq

Thank you for stopping by again! :)

Reply

Leave a Comment

Please note that information on purchasing Japanese cosmetics on-line can be found on my FAQ page.

Thank you very much!

Previous post:

Next post: